It is currently Sat May 19, 2012 3:10 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:38 am
Posts: 128
JQ - $800b sounds right if you include Afghanistan. I read a lot about $8billion per month for Iraq - 5 years worth is roughly $500b - but however we slice it, its a ton of money.
This "estimate" includes some bullshit though - the cost per family of $100 barrel oil for example. Oil prices are NOT about Iraq, its about China.

As far as the money goes - hopefully the Iraqi gov't will get those oil revenues going to assist - but its never been about the money for me. IF - and this is a big IF - if the cause is worthwhile, morally or security wise, I wouldn't worry about how much it costs.


Kizz - I think this is a political mistake by the democrats. They are putting this "estimate" out there, and then they are going to approve more spending for Iraq. I really think they are giving the GoP a gift by sharing responsibility. Can they really make a major case out of this next year - after funding the war for 2 years?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
No, they can't make ANY sort of major case out of it next year. Not any sort of case that can hold any water anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:38 am
Posts: 128
I agree with Kizz - the can't campaign on stopping the war - AGAIN.

Can't dip from that well again. I'm honestly astonished that the democrats would squander this issue for 08.

06 was the first significant congressional victory for the democrats since 94 - this issue would have ensured a white house win next time.

I really don't get it.

The only answer is that they indeed think that they can use the same campaign as last time - I think the electorate won't buy it again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
I agree completely. They need to focus on other issues, and I don't believe they will.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:38 am
Posts: 128
If they are giving up on the war (my belief is that they never intended of stopping it) - how about an energy bill? A climate change bill? An education bill?

Something ...................................... this crop passed a modest minimum wage increase and have renamed like 50 federal buildings. WTF?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
You are correct. To me they have been an absolute joke. The republicans may not be doing much either, but at least as of lately they haven't been making it sound like they're so passionate about something they intend on doing nothing about.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO