It is currently Sat May 19, 2012 2:04 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:13 pm
Posts: 150
Okay, we are retreading old ground. Being hopeful about something doesn't make it happen. You can't petition the military. They do things the way they do because that's how they are instructed to do it from the government. You want to change the military? Change the government.

Thinking a military base would adopt state law over federal law is...not looking at the entire picture. If every military base in every state observed local laws over federal ones, the military would have an overwhelming set of arbitrary laws, many of which would conflict with one another. The military doesn't answer to the state it is in, it answers to the federal government. That's how it is, sorry. All the hopeful or foolish thinking in the entire world is not going to change that.

And NO the military DOES NOT CARE! The only thing the military cares about is the safety of their soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen. If someone walks into a gay bar and rumors start, and there is a possibility for hate-inspired violence, the military is going to take steps to prevent that. They work on a case-by-case basis. There is no SECDEFINST that says gays must be kicked out. The military branch will examine the situation. They will, in as many cases as possible, retain the service member and seek alternate means of resolution, including, but not limited to NJP for the people inciting the problems, forfeiture of pay of the inciting individuals, reassignment of any or all service members, counseling, human sensitivity and leadership classes, temporarily assigned duties, or extra duties, among other things. In most cases, separation of the gay service member is a last resort. The reason so many people think that gays are separated based solely on their sexuality is because that makes good journalism. Those are the only cases you hear about out of the military. You never hear the story of how everything was solved amicably because that makes a shitty news bite. I know the situation because I spent more than 6 years in the military, and I sat in on several NJP's and court martials dealing with the aforementioned subject matter, and the gay was not always the victim! I had to go to bat for my sailors more times that I would have liked, and every case was different. Every case boiled down to the same thing though, did someone violate the UCMJ and is someone in danger?

I'm telling you the cold, hard, facts. There is absolutely NO opinion in anything I've said up to this point. This is the way things are in reality. You want something different? Talk to your government officials.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
I've known 2 people who have been kicked out of the military. One of them was because they were caught going to a gay bar and rumors started. The people I know seem to have experienced something different than you have. You might be very well telling the truth, but so am I.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:17 pm
Posts: 1413
Quote:
I've known 2 people who have been kicked out of the military. One of them was because they were caught going to a gay bar and rumors started. The people I know seem to have experienced something different than you have. You might be very well telling the truth, but so am I.


Yeah, the military DOES care. I read a great book by a guy who was in the military his whole life. He got really high up in rank, received a degree from the US Military Academy, and then got Harvard Masters Degree in military strategy. No Joe shmo. He now works as a military contributor for Fox News.

The author is Brian Haig. The book is Mortal Allies. The main topic of the story covers homosexuality and his opinion of it (and other people's opinion of it too) as he tries to break this a complicated bungle in South Korea. One of the best books I have read in ages. Couldn't put it down. Read what he says about it.


(And if you do, read the whole book because otherwise you are going to think the guy is just your typical military homophobe-- he isn't, but he definitely starts out that way.)


He seems to think that homosexuality is a common, controversial, and important issue in the US military, to the people who are in it. And seeing about all of his experience in the military, his degree from the military academy, and his further education in the military field, I tend to believe he knows what he is talking about.

And that is the cold reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
Well, another thing is--the people who I know that were kicked out are both very effeminate. Nothing against feminine people. But it would seem THAT is what they were targeted for. Maybe there's something I don't know about. I just know that people are being kicked out for their sexuality who should not have been.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:26 am
Posts: 217
No one here should have a problem kicking gays out of the military. All they need to do is say they aren't matching up with Christian values enough. That apparently justifies anything.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
I just think it's sad that someone with a violent crime history is eligible to be in the military, but heaven forbid a rumor goes around that someone might be gay--oh my!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:04 pm
Posts: 28
technocrat wrote:
No one here should have a problem kicking gays out of the military. All they need to do is say they aren't matching up with Christian values enough. That apparently justifies anything.


Thats a sad truth. Religion loves to pick on people. Gays, blacks, women, all have been picked on by religion (not just Christianity but that is one example). Religion claims to be so pure, yet it also bullies people.

This example of gays not being allowed in the military is the same.

_________________
Over and over I keep on coming back for more; I play into your fantasy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:10 am
Posts: 145
During the days of Mister Bush Sr, I joined the US Army. I was going to be trained as an interpreter/translator.
When I enlisted, I was directly asked "are you currently having or have you ever had a homosexual relationship?" And, at the time, I could honestly answer "No" to both parts of the question.
Had they asked "Do you look FABULOUS in 3 inch sling-back f-me pumps and a backless black dress?" prior to initiating my background check, they could have saved us both a lot of time, and them a lot of money.
Granted, this was before Don't Ask/Don't Tell/Don't Pursue (funny how people are often oblivious to the third part of that).

Even more odd, I still get recruitment letters from the air force, navy and army on a fairly regular basis. When I'm feeling rather catty, I'll respond and ask them if I will get some kind of assistance to pay for my SRS.

For some reason, the answer is always "no."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Posts: 5368
Location: Tacoma, WA USA
Highscores: 1

Kizzume
Luckily, there has been a big push recently to end the ban of gays in the military. Gates seems intent on changing the policies, at last.

_________________
Political Buddies


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:03 pm 
Offline
Tech Support
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:14 pm
Posts: 1241
Location: In ur base
Highscores: 12
jen wrote:
I really wish they would just not worry about sexual orientation in the military. I know my husband would not care.


Most people in the military nowadays don't care. All along it's been the top leadership (part of the old guard) who have been most strongly opposed.

But you can teach old dogs new tricks...

Quote:
The Army general who was Joint Chiefs chairman when the Pentagon adopted its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays says he no longer opposes allowing them to serve openly.

John Shalikashvili, who retired in 1997 after four years as the nation’s top military officer, had argued that allowing homosexuals to serve openly would hurt troop morale and recruitment and undermine the cohesion of combat units. He said he has changed his mind after meeting with gay servicemen.

“These conversations showed me just how much the military has changed, and that gays and lesbians can be accepted by their peers,” Shalikashvili wrote in an opinion piece in Tuesday’s New York Times

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16442271/ns ... -military/


And that was written in 2007. For something a little more current,

Quote:
The nation's top uniformed officer said today that he supports allowing gays to serve openly the military, providing a powerful voice of support for President Obama call to lift the legal ban on their service.

Launching a formal process to change the longstanding policy, the Pentagon also announced a review that will examine the effects of a policy change along with alterations in military benefits, rules and facilities might be needed to allow gays to serve openly in the armed forces.

The review could take up to a year, and will fuel concerns among advocates for gay service members that any change will be slow in coming about.

Admiral Michael G. Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee that the military still needs to conduct a review to determine how to prepare for a dramatic policy change. Nonetheless, he said his personal views were firm.

"Speaking for myself and myself only, it is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do," Mullen said.

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/polit ... l_for.html

Feb 2, 2010

Quote:
Washington (CNN) -- Colin Powell, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and former secretary of state, has come out in favor of eventually repealing the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gay and lesbian service members.
"In the almost seventeen years since the 'don't ask, don't tell' legislation was passed, attitudes and circumstances have changed," Powell said in a statement released by his office Wednesday.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/03/ ... .military/

Feb 3, 2010

_________________
Political Buddies


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO